Tag: featured

  • The 17 Fastest Aero Gravel Bikes In The World: Wind Tunnel Tested

    The 17 Fastest Aero Gravel Bikes In The World: Wind Tunnel Tested

    Aero gravel bikes seem to be the latest frontier in cycling’s fastest-growing bike category.

    With brands increasingly developing bikes in wind tunnels, we’re now seeing some remarkably sophisticated (and occasionally radical) designs emerge. Streamlined frames, deep carbon wheels, and narrow integrated cockpits are all being used in an effort to bring road-bike speed to gravel riding.

    There’s a good reason for this. As a rule of thumb, aerodynamic drag becomes the largest force resisting a cyclist at around 18 km/h. This is a speed that most riders can comfortably exceed, even on gravel roads. As speed increases, aerodynamic drag rises dramatically, making it one of the biggest factors influencing performance.

    So, how much faster is an aero gravel bike than a regular gravel bike? And how does it compare to a modern road bike?

    In this article, we’ll examine the differences between typical and aero-optimised gravel bikes, analyse the available wind tunnel data, and reveal the 17 fastest aero gravel bikes out there today.

    Let’s get into it!

    Why Are Gravel Bikes Becoming More Aerodynamic?

    Mads Würtz Schmidt is putting his bike’s aerodynamics to good work.

    There are several reasons bike brands are moving toward aero gravel bikes.

    Firstly, riders increasingly want one bike for both road and gravel riding. The challenge is that typical gravel bikes, with their rounded frame tubes and slower rolling tyres, can require 40 watts more power than road bikes to maintain 30 km/h. In practical terms, that means pushing your pedals roughly 20–30% harder just to ride at the same speed.

    To close this gap, manufacturers are investing heavily in improving both aerodynamics and rolling efficiency. The result is a new generation of gravel bikes that are substantially faster on the road than their predecessors. And when combined with fast tyres and wheels, the best aero gravel bikes can cut the performance deficit to a road bike by more than half.

    Secondly, racing speeds are rising. At events like Unbound 200, average speeds have increased from around 32 km/h in 2021 to roughly 38 km/h today. Because aerodynamic drag increases sharply with speed, this makes aero gains significantly more important than they used to be.

    And by the way, aero savings still matter for slower riders completing long events. While faster riders may see larger absolute watt savings, slower riders spend more time on course, meaning even modest watt savings can translate into big time differences by the finish line.

    Categories of Gravel Bikes

    Non-aero
    Semi-aero
    Fully-aero

    Before looking at the wind tunnel results below, it helps to first break gravel bikes into three broad aerodynamic categories based on their frame and component design. This makes it easier to understand what actually defines an aero gravel bike in practice.

    Non-Aero Gravel Bikes:
    These bikes make little to no attempt to reduce aerodynamic drag. They typically feature shallow-depth wheels, round frame tubes, round handlebars, and exposed brake and shift cables. The overall design prioritises simplicity and practicality over aero efficiency.

    Semi-Aero Gravel Bikes:
    Bikes in this category introduce more shaping and integration. Frames often use slightly deeper tube profiles, forks and handlebars may be more aero-shaped, and cables are usually fully or partially hidden. These bikes are often paired with moderately deep wheels (eg. 35-45 mm rim depths).

    Fully-Aero Gravel Bikes:
    These bikes are extensively developed using wind tunnel testing and/or CFD analysis to optimise the entire system for minimum drag. You’ll find deep aero shapes on the frame, fork, cockpit, and wheels, in particular. The goal is maximum speed, especially at higher velocities where aerodynamic resistance dominates performance.

    Ok, let’s now find out how much faster an aero gravel bike is than a regular gravel bike.

    CyclingNews Wind Tunnel Test

    Bike CategoryRim DepthWatts Saved vs Baseline
    Lauf SeiglaNon-aero31 mmBaseline
    Basso Palta IIISemi-aero48 mm8 watts
    3T Racemax 2 ItaliaFully-aero45 mm10 watts
    Trek Checkmate SLRSemi-aero35 mm11 watts
    REAP Type 300Fully-aero54 mm17 watts
    Pinarello Dogma GRFully-aero45 mm18 watts
    Argon 18 Anti MatterFully-aero54 mm18 watts
    Wilier Rave SLR ID2Fully-aero48 mm21 watts
    Specialized Crux 5Fully-aero50 mm21 watts
    Tested with a rider on the bike and 50 mm tyres fitted.

    Our first wind tunnel test is by CyclingNews, which took a range of gravel bikes to compare the aerodynamic performance of non-aero, semi-aero, and fully aero designs. With a test rider included in the measurements, they found a spread of approximately 21 watts between the fastest and slowest bikes at 40 km/h.

    At the slow end of the spectrum was the Lauf Seigla, which uses external brake hoses, a conventional round handlebar, and shallow-depth wheels. As this configuration closely resembles that of many mainstream gravel bikes, it provides a useful baseline.

    The fastest bikes in the test were the Specialized Crux and Wilier Rave SLR, with the Argon 18 Anti Matter and Pinarello Dogma GR not far behind. Given the margin of error (1.6 watts) inherent in wind tunnel testing, the latter two bikes could still claim to be the fastest aero gravel bikes in the test. The REAP Type 300 was sitting around one watt further behind.

    aero gravel bikes
    The Argon 18 Anti Matter is one of the fastest aero gravel bikes currently available. Image: Argon 18

    In this test, the 3T Racemax appears to have underperformed for a fully-aero bike with fast wheels. But as it was a last-minute addition, this bike was configured with much wider bars and a taller stack than the rest, which slowed it down in the wind tunnel. It also had a 2X drivetrain, which could be another aero penalty to the tune of 2 watts at these speeds.

    One particularly interesting result was the 13-watt gap between the Basso Palta and Wilier Rave SLR. These bikes both used the same wheelset, suggesting that the advantage of a fully-aero gravel frame over a semi-aero design likely exceeds 10 watts at 40 km/h.

    Please note that this is just a tiny portion of the data from the CyclingNews wind tunnel. You can see bike-only drag testing, testing with standardised wheels, and aero drag at different speeds HERE.

    TOUR Magazine Wind Tunnel Test

    Bike CategoryDrag at 45 km/hWatts Saved vs Baseline
    Canyon GrailNon-aero247 wattsBaseline
    3T ExploroSemi-aero238 watts9 watts
    Ridley Kanzo FastFully-aero223* watts24 watts*
    Tested with dummy legs mounted to the bike and G-One RS 40 mm tyres. Error margin ±0.3w. *Value derived from interpreting the wind tunnel results described in the TOUR Magazine article.

    TOUR Magazine has also taken a few gravel bikes to the wind tunnel, and its data clearly show that aero frames, cockpits, and wheels make a meaningful difference on gravel bikes, especially at higher speeds.

    At 45 km/h and with the same 50 mm deep wheels and 40 mm wide tyres, the semi-aero 3T Exploro required roughly 9 watts less power than the non-aero Canyon Grail. And the fully aero Ridley Kanzo Fast pushed that advantage even further, requiring approximately 24 watts less power than the Canyon. That’s broadly consistent with the CyclingNews findings once differences in testing speed are taken into account.

    TOUR also repeated the tests using completely slick Challenge Strada Bianca 40 mm tyres. These reduced aerodynamic drag even further, lowering power requirements by an additional 3 to 4 watts across all bikes.

    Even at a slower speed of 35 km/h, the testing showed the 3T Exploro was 4.5 watts faster than the Canyon Grail, and the Ridley Kanzo Fast was 12 watts faster than the Canyon Grail.

    Bike CategoryDrag at 45 km/hWatts Saved vs Baseline
    Canyon GrailNon-aero237* wattsBaseline
    3T ExploroSemi-aero230 watts7 watts
    Ridley Kanzo FastFully-aero216 watts21 watts
    Tested with dummy legs mounted to the bike and Pro One 34 mm tyres. Error margin ±0.3w. *Value derived from interpreting the wind tunnel results described in the TOUR Magazine article.

    Another interesting finding was what happened when TOUR fitted Schwalbe Pro One 34 mm road bike tyres to these gravel bikes to see how they’d compare to a modern road bike.

    A common drag figure in the GST wind tunnel for a road bike using this protocol is between 210 and 220 watts. That means the Canyon Grail and 3T Exploro still trail modern road bikes by a good 10-15 watts, even with tyres of a similar width.

    The Ridley Kanzo Fast, however, is in road-bike territory. It delivers wind tunnel numbers that are genuinely competitive with many road bikes (216W). That said, while the Ridley is very fast, it still falls over 20 watts short of the fastest aero road bikes ever tested by TOUR in the wind tunnel!

    You can see the TOUR Magazine wind tunnel data HERE.

    Fastest Aero Gravel Bikes (Confirmed)

    Specialized Crux 5

    The Specialized Crux 5 has been piloted to numerous gravel race podiums already.

    The Specialized Crux 5 proves that a gravel bike doesn’t have to sacrifice weight to be aerodynamically competitive. Not only does it feature one of the lightest gravel framesets available (1,189 grams), but wind tunnel testing suggests it’s also among the fastest gravel bikes on the market.

    Add 55 mm tyre clearance and complete bike weights starting at around 7 kg (15 lb), and the Crux offers a compelling blend of low weight, aerodynamic efficiency, and gravel road versatility. Just don’t look too closely at the price tag of the flagship model…

    Unlike some of the more overtly aero bikes in this guide, the Crux takes a subtler approach to reducing drag. Specialized has the advantage of operating its own wind tunnel, allowing the company to test and refine designs more extensively and cost-effectively than most competitors.

    According to Specialized, approximately half of the aerodynamic gains compared to the previous-generation Crux came from the frameset itself. The wheelset accounted for roughly 30% of the improvement, while the handlebar contributed the remaining 20%. Based on the wind tunnel data available, those figures appear entirely plausible.

    Wilier Rave SLR ID2

    The Wilier Rave SLR ID2 uses some radical frame shapes that make it one of the fastest aero gravel bikes.

    Wilier has clearly invested heavily in aero development in recent years. Its latest road and gravel race bikes (the Filante SLR and Rave SLR) have both delivered impressive wind tunnel performances in the Silverstone wind tunnel.

    The Rave SLR incorporates many of the features now associated with leading aero race bikes. The head tube is deep and projects prominently ahead of the frame, while the downtube transitions from a narrow leading edge near the head tube to a broader midsection before flaring towards the bottom bracket. This shaping improves airflow around the water bottles while remaining aero and stiff.

    Other aerodynamic details include dropped seat stays, a rear-wheel cutout in the seat tube, and a slim integrated cockpit. The relatively narrow 370 mm or 390 mm handlebar width is likely a significant contributor to the bike’s aerodynamic performance, as reducing rider frontal area often yields larger gains than frame design alone.

    Despite its race-focused design, the Rave SLR remains thoroughly modern, offering clearance for tyres up to 52 mm wide.

    Argon 18 Anti Matter

    The Argon 18 Anti Matter is a speed machine in the wind tunnel.

    The Argon 18 Anti Matter doesn’t just have one of the boldest names in cycling; it also backs it up with impressive aerodynamic performance. In CyclingNews’ wind tunnel testing, it was actually the fastest bike when measured without a rider. Once a rider was added, it slipped back by only a few watts, remaining well within the test’s margin of error and effectively tied with the fastest bikes on test.

    According to Argon 18, the Anti Matter’s development involved more than 800 hours of CFD analysis and 45 hours of wind tunnel testing. The result is a frame featuring a deep head tube, a large truncated downtube, and narrow dropped seat stays. Even the bottle cages received aerodynamic attention, sitting flush against the frame and partially shielded by the downtube to improve airflow. Argon 18 also claims the dedicated frame bag shown above adds no aerodynamic penalty.

    The aerodynamic focus continues with a fully integrated cockpit designed to reduce frontal area and clean up airflow around the rider, helping the bike achieve its impressive wind tunnel results.

    The Anti Matter offers a generous 55 mm tyre clearance. And the low-mounted seat stays and their horizontal junction with the seat tube are also intended to provide some vertical compliance.

    Pinarello Dogma GR

    The Pinarello Dogma GR has unique styling that is also proven to be fast.

    Pinarello has a long history of developing exceptionally fast bicycles. The company has produced some of the quickest time trial and track bikes ever made, with riders such as Filippo Ganna using them to regularly win at the highest level, including setting the Hour Record.

    The Dogma GR brings that same aerodynamic focus to gravel racing. True to Pinarello’s design language, the frame features the brand’s distinctive wavy tube profiles and asymmetric shaping. While the aesthetics may divide opinion, the wind tunnel results are difficult to argue with. Like the Anti Matter, the Dogma GR finished within the margin of error of being the fastest gravel bike tested by CyclingNews.

    The main compromise is tyre clearance. With room for tyres up to 45 mm wide, the Dogma GR is better suited to a mix of tarmac and smoother gravel roads.

    Ridley Kanzo Fast

    The Ridley Kanzo Fast was released in 2020 and is still one of the fastest aero gravel bikes.

    Ridley was one of the earliest brands to take gravel-bike aerodynamics seriously, and its long-term focus on the category is reflected by the fact that no fewer than three Ridley models feature in this article!

    The Kanzo Fast was Ridley’s original aero gravel race bike, developed with events such as Unbound firmly in mind. At the time (2020), it represented one of the most comprehensive attempts to apply road-bike aerodynamic principles to gravel racing.

    The frame features deep, narrow tube profiles, smooth integration between the fork, frame, and cockpit, heavily dropped seat stays, and a seat tube shaped to shield the rear wheel from the airflow. Combined, these features helped make the Kanzo Fast the fastest gravel bike in TOUR Magazine’s GST wind tunnel testing.

    Its main limitation today is tyre clearance. As the oldest bike in this guide, the Kanzo Fast is restricted to 42 mm tyres, leaving it well behind the latest generation of gravel race bikes. As a result, it’s best suited to mixed-surface riding, smoother gravel roads, and races with a significant amount of pavement rather than the roughest modern gravel courses.

    REAP Type 300

    This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is REAP-Type-300-Fastest-Aero-Gravel-Bikes-1000x604.jpg
    Some radical shapes can be found on the REAP Type 300, making it very quick in the wind tunnel.

    The REAP Type 300 features one of the most aggressive aerodynamic designs of any gravel bike currently available. Deep tube sections, sharp transitions, and tightly radiused edges make its intentions immediately obvious. Based on the available wind tunnel data, those design choices appear to be paying off.

    Much of the aerodynamic thinking behind the Type 300 has been carried over from REAP’s Vekta road bike, helping to explain its strong performance. The frame employs many of the same principles seen on modern aero road bikes, including truncated tube profiles, carefully managed airflow around key frame junctions, and a highly integrated overall design.

    For those unfamiliar with the brand, REAP specialises in high-performance, made-to-order bicycles that are designed and manufactured in the UK. The company uses carbon fibre reinforced with natural fibres, combining advanced composite engineering with a distinctive manufacturing approach.

    Despite its aerodynamic focus, the Type 300 offers clearance for tyres up to 53 mm wide, putting it firmly in line with the requirements of modern gravel racing. It’s also one of the few bikes here to retain road Q-factor dimensions, with a narrower distance between the crank arms than most gravel bikes. That’s particularly impressive given the combination of short chainstays and generous tyre clearance, two design requirements that typically push gravel bikes toward wider crank spacing.

    3T RaceMax 2 Italia

    This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is 3T-Racemax-2-Italia-Fastest-Aero-Gravel-Bikes-1000x573.jpeg
    3T have been at the forefront of aero gravel designs for many years, and the RaceMax 2 Italia is their latest offering.

    3T was one of the pioneers of aero gravel bike design, so it’s no surprise to see its bikes perform above average in wind tunnel testing. The RaceMax 2 incorporates a number of aerodynamic features, including a notably wide 75 mm downtube designed to shield a water bottle and cage from the airflow. The downtube also features a subtle front-wheel cutout, a design element more commonly seen on time trial bikes.

    At the rear, the seat tube closely follows the contour of the wheel to reduce drag while helping keep the chainstays short. The RaceMax 2 offers clearance for tyres up to 51 mm wide, which should be sufficient for the vast majority of gravel riders and race courses.

    The RaceMax 2 Italia frameset is handmade in Italy using resin transfer moulding (RTM), a manufacturing process that differs from conventional carbon frame production. Dry-woven, filament-wound carbon fibre is placed into the mould before resin is injected and cured. Proponents of RTM claim it allows for more consistent resin distribution, a lower likelihood of internal defects, and reduced manufacturing waste.

    3T has also been ahead of the curve in gravel wheel aerodynamics. Since 2020, the company has offered wheelsets with a 29 mm internal rim width, a dimension specifically optimised for modern high-volume gravel tyres. The wider rim helps maintain smoother airflow around the tyre-wheel interface, improving aerodynamic efficiency compared to narrower designs. The CyclingNews wind tunnel data lends support to this approach, showing that 3T’s wheels remain highly competitive aerodynamically when paired with 50 mm tyres, despite being several years old and facing competition from the latest generation of gravel-specific wheelsets.

    Fastest Aero Gravel Bikes (Unconfirmed)

    BMC Kaius 01

    lightest gravel bikes
    The BMC Kaius 01 is incredibly light but also likely quick in the wind tunnel.

    The BMC Kaius 01 combines a low frame weight with a high aerodynamic efficiency. And despite being one of the lightest framesets here, TOUR Magazine’s testing also found it to be among the stiffest both laterally and torsionally.

    The frame incorporates many of the features now common on top-tier aero gravel bikes: truncated aero tube profiles, dropped seat stays, and a seat tube cutout that partially shields the rear wheel. Up front, the integrated cockpit uses a narrow frontal profile and aero shaping to save additional watts. This bike should be quick in the wind tunnel.

    A recent update has also brought the Kaius 01 in line with modern gravel racing trends by increasing tyre clearance to 52 mm. That gives riders the option to run the larger-volume tyres that are becoming increasingly common at the highest levels of gravel competition.

    Cannondale Super X

    The Cannondale SuperX has had aero-optimisation applied to its leading-edge surfaces.

    The Cannondale SuperX is another potentially fast aero gravel bike. Much of its design appears to draw inspiration from the surprisingly aero SuperSix EVO road bike, a model that has consistently performed well in independent wind tunnel testing.

    While Cannondale hasn’t published specific aerodynamic figures beyond describing the bike as “super aero”, several design features point to its commitment to reducing drag. Most notable are the bike’s leading-edge surfaces, which are the head tube, fork, and cockpit. These have all been carefully shaped to improve airflow around the front of the bike, where aerodynamic gains are often easiest to achieve.

    Like many of Cannondale’s performance bikes, the SuperX also places a strong emphasis on comfort. The seat tube, rear triangle, and D-shaped seatpost are engineered to provide controlled vertical flex, helping the bike absorb vibrations and impacts. This is important on gravel surfaces, where improved system compliance may not only increase comfort but also help maintain speed while reducing rider fatigue and energy expenditure.

    Tyre clearance is good, although slightly behind the newest generation of gravel race bikes. The SuperX accommodates tyres up to 48 mm wide at the rear and 51 mm at the front, which should still be more than adequate for the vast majority of gravel surface conditions.

    Canyon Grail CFR (Prototype)

    fastest aero gravel bikes
    The next-generation Canyon Grail CFR will likely be one of the fastest aero gravel bikes when it’s released.

    Our first of three prototypes on this list is the upcoming Canyon Grail CFR, a gravel bike expected to be released soon.

    With a notably deep head tube, downtube, and fork, the next-generation Grail CFR clearly draws inspiration from Canyon’s Aeroad and Endurace road bikes, both of which have proven exceptionally fast in independent wind tunnel testing. While no aero data has yet been published, the design suggests Canyon is targeting the very sharp end of gravel-bike aerodynamics.

    The frame clears 55 mm Schwalbe Thunder Burt tyres, and possibly even has enough additional room for 57 mm tyres. If those figures prove accurate, the new Grail CFR will combine cutting-edge aero performance with generous tyre clearances now demanded in modern gravel racing. It appears set to sit at the forefront of both trends when it eventually reaches production.

    Cervelo Aspero 5

    The Cervelo Aspero-5 has been modelled after other wind tunnel-proven bikes by Cervelo.

    Cervélo has long been one of the industry’s leaders in aerodynamic development, with much of the brand’s reputation built on extensive wind tunnel testing. Drawing inspiration from the highly aerodynamic S5 road bike, the Áspero-5 brings many of those same speed-focused design principles to gravel racing.

    The frame has a range of aerodynamic features, including deep profiles on the head tube and downtube, a seat tube that closely follows the curvature of the rear wheel, slender fork blades, an hourglass-shaped head tube, and a narrow wing-shaped handlebar. Combined, these elements create one of the more overtly aero-focused gravel bikes on the market.

    The main limitation of the Áspero-5 by modern standards is tyre clearance. With room for tyres up to 45 mm wide, it gives away as much as 12 mm to some of the latest gravel race bikes. As a result, it’s likely best suited to smoother gravel roads, where its aero advantages can be fully exploited without the need for the largest tyre sizes.

    Factor Ostro Gravel

    The Factor Ostro Gravel has been around a while, and there’s no doubt it’d be faster than most in the wind tunnel.

    The Factor Ostro Gravel incorporates significantly more aero shaping than a typical gravel bike, and given Factor’s strong track record in wind tunnel development, it’s reasonable to expect it to be faster than most gravel bikes on the market.

    The frame features a deeper, truncated head tube profile, tight integration between the fork crown and frame, dropped seat stays, an aero seatpost, and a subtle rear-wheel cutout in the seat tube. Individually, these features may offer modest gains, but together they create a bike clearly designed with aerodynamic efficiency in mind.

    Like the Cervélo Áspero-5, however, the Ostro Gravel’s 45 mm tyre clearance is beginning to look a little conservative compared to the latest generation of gravel race bikes, many of which now accommodate tyres exceeding 50 mm. That said, for riders spending significant time on tarmac, hardpack gravel, and smoother race courses, 45 mm remains more than adequate and may even be the sweet spot for many applications.

    Factor ONE Gravel (Prototype)

    The Factor ONE gravel is a radical prototype that will likely push the limits of speed in the wind tunnel.

    Keep an eye on the Factor ONE gravel prototype, which has been appearing at several high-profile gravel events. If the Ostro Gravel wasn’t aero enough, the ONE takes things even further. Looking at the two bikes side by side, most of the additional aerodynamic development appears to have been concentrated around the front end of the bike.

    The most striking feature is the ultra-wide fork. The fork blades are positioned unusually far apart, not only to accommodate large tyres but also as part of the bike’s aerodynamic strategy. Interestingly, wind tunnel testing has shown that both very narrow and very wide fork designs can be effective at managing airflow, depending on how they interact with the front wheel and the rider’s legs.

    The prototype offers clearance for tyres up to 57 mm wide, placing it among the most capable aero gravel bikes yet seen. Those tyres are paired with a new generation of wide, 64 mm-deep Black Inc wheels. Combined, the tyre and rim likely create a wheel profile more than 115 mm tall – far deeper than anything we’ve previously seen on a gravel race bike.

    While no wind tunnel data has yet been released, the design language makes one thing clear: the ONE is intended to push aerodynamic performance beyond what was achieved with the already-fast Ostro Gravel.

    Felt Breed

    The Felt Breed has aero features throughout, making it worthy of the aero gravel bike categorisation.

    Felt has been spending plenty of time in the wind tunnel lately. The company recently launched its highly aerodynamic FRD Nexar road bike, and many of the lessons learned there appear to have influenced the latest Breed gravel bike. Given Felt’s long history in aero development, this focus on speed comes as little surprise.

    Rather than applying aggressive aero shaping throughout the frame, Felt appears to have concentrated its efforts on the bike’s leading-edge surfaces. The cockpit, fork, and head tube are all notably slender, helping to minimise the frontal area exposed to the wind. This targeted approach allows the Breed to balance aerodynamic efficiency with exceptionally low weight. In fact, at just over 7 kg (15 lb) in its top specification, it’s one of the lightest complete gravel bikes available, second only to the S-Works Crux.

    The new Breed also embraces the trend toward wider gravel tyres, offering clearance for up to 54 mm at the front and 52 mm at the rear. Combined with a standard 27.2 mm round seatpost (typically one of the more compliant seatpost designs), the bike should deliver excellent comfort on rough surfaces.

    Ridley ASTR RS

    The Ridley ASTR RS is Ridley’s second-generation aero gravel bike, which should be incredibly fast in the wind tunnel.

    Ridley leaves little doubt about the purpose of the ASTR RS. This is a dedicated aero gravel race bike, with the frameset, cockpit, and wheels all designed to minimise drag and maximise speed.

    The ASTR RS effectively replaces the Kanzo Fast, retaining its aerodynamic focus while bringing the bike up to modern gravel standards with 52 mm tyre clearance. This allows riders to take advantage of the larger tyre sizes that are increasingly proving faster on rough and demanding race courses.

    One of the fastest aspects of the ASTR RS is the cockpit. The handlebar measures just 360 mm wide at the hoods to reduce frontal area and aerodynamic drag, while a pronounced flare creates a much wider stance in the drops, improving control when the speeds are high and the terrain is rough.

    Ridley RS2 (Prototype)

    The Ridley RS2 takes aero shaping and tyre clearance to the extreme. It will be interesting to see how it does in the wind tunnel.

    Our third prototype is the Ridley RS2, a bike that has been appearing beneath pro riders at some of the world’s biggest gravel races. While Ridley has yet to release any technical details, the bike’s design leaves little doubt about its priorities.

    With extremely deep tube profiles throughout the frame and a narrow integrated cockpit similar to that of the ASTR RS, the RS2 appears to be Ridley’s most aerodynamically focused gravel bike yet.

    The prototype also embraces the latest trend in gravel race bike design, offering clearance for tyres up to 57 mm wide. That’s a figure increasingly adopted by forward-thinking brands as larger-volume tyres continue to prove faster and more efficient on rough gravel courses.

    My only reservation concerns the deep aero seatpost. A similarly shaped seatpost on the Ridley Noah Fast road bike was measured to require roughly three times more force to flex than many competing designs. If the RS2 follows a similar path, comfort could become extra dependent on wide, supple tyres and lower tyre pressures to absorb vibrations and impacts from rough terrain.

    SEKA ExAero GR

    The SEKA Exaero GR has been internally tested to be super quick in the Silverstone wind tunnel.

    SEKA may not yet be a widely recognised name in gravel cycling, but the brand has clearly invested heavily in aerodynamic development. Its Spear road bike has undergone extensive wind tunnel testing, placing it among the top tier of aero road bikes, just behind some of the fastest designs ever produced.

    Based on those same design principles, the SEKA ExAero GR is expected to deliver impressive aerodynamic efficiency. According to the company’s white paper, an ExAero GR fitted with 45 mm tyres requires approximately 10 watts more power to maintain 40 km/h than a Spear running 28 mm tyres. If accurate, that would make it an exceptionally fast gravel bike given the much larger tyre volume.

    One of the more distinctive design elements is the “Wind Eye”, located where the seat stays meet the seat tube. This opening is intended to manage airflow in a turbulent region of the frame. On the Spear road bike, SEKA claims it reduces aerodynamic drag by approximately 3 watts at 40 km/h.

    The frame itself is a one-piece monocoque construction, which is relatively uncommon in gravel bikes, where multi-piece layups are more typical. This approach is technically challenging and expensive to manufacture, but SEKA claims that, for a given frame weight, it improves load-path continuity and results in greater stiffness.

    SEKA also states that its carbon seatpost allows up to 16 mm of vertical movement, with a stiffness of 106 N/mm. That makes it around 25% more compliant than a typical round alloy seatpost, making it similar in comfort to D-shaped seatposts commonly used by brands such as Giant, Cannondale, and BMC.

    Finally, the ExAero GR offers tyre clearance up to 56 mm at the front and 52 mm at the rear. This places it firmly among the most progressive gravel race bikes, making it suitable for a wide range of course conditions.

  • Real vs Fake Shimano Chains: Counterfeits Wear Out 4x Faster

    Real vs Fake Shimano Chains: Counterfeits Wear Out 4x Faster

    Fake Shimano chains have flooded the market, and unless you regularly buy and inspect genuine Shimano chains, spotting a counterfeit can be surprisingly difficult.

    That’s a serious problem because fake chains don’t just wear out faster, but they’re also weaker. This not only increases your drivetrain running costs but can also create a safety concern.

    This article is partly a public service announcement: if you’re buying a new chain, you need to be careful. But it’s also an opportunity to see just how poorly counterfeit Shimano chains perform when subjected to controlled laboratory testing.

    Let’s get into it!

    Real vs Fake Shimano Chains

    Genuine Shimano Chain

    Chain Wear When New: 0.00 mm
    Chain Width:
    5.67 mm
    Roller Diameter: 7.65 mm
    Price: US $64

    Escape Collective sourced three chains sold as “Shimano HG901-11” models and measured their dimensions. A genuine Shimano HG901-11 chain served as the benchmark for comparison and was, unsurprisingly, the most expensive of the three at US $64.

    As expected, the genuine chain showed no measurable wear when new. Its dimensions were exactly where they should be, with no evidence of elongation or manufacturing deviation straight out of the box.

    The packaging differed from that of the counterfeit chains. The box had a more matte finish that could be marked with a pen without smudging, and the barcode on the rear was applied as a separate sticker. The master link was also packaged separately from the chain itself.

    Fake eBay Chain

    Chain Width: 5.68 mm – 0.1 mm wider
    Roller Diameter: 7.65 mm – Same size
    Chain Wear When New: 0.03 mm
    Price: US $40

    Purchased from eBay, this fake Shimano chain costs roughly 40% less than the genuine Shimano product.

    Dimensionally, it was relatively close to the genuine chain. The roller diameter matched exactly, while the overall width was only fractionally larger. However, it already showed measurable wear straight out of the box with an elongation of 0.03 mm.

    The packaging contained several clues that it was not real. Ironically, it included a sticker and barcode claiming authenticity, while the genuine Shimano chain did not. The box had a glossier finish that smudged when marked with a pen, and the rear barcode was printed directly onto the packaging rather than applied as a sticker. The master link was also packaged inside the same bag as the chain.

    Fake AliExpress Chain

    Chain Width: 5.77 mm – 0.1 mm wider
    Roller Diameter: 7.7 mm – 0.05 mm bigger
    Chain Wear When New: 0.12 mm
    Price: US $20

    At just US $20, or around 70% cheaper than the genuine Shimano chain, the fake AliExpress version is going to be tempting to many. But its measurements were alarming before it had even been fitted to a bicycle.

    The chain was 0.1 mm wider and the rollers 0.05 mm bigger. This might not sound like much, but it matters. Riders who have purchased fake chains like this have reported more drivetrain noise and poorer shifting performance. In addition, the chain already exhibited 0.12 mm of wear straight out of the box.

    Unlike the other two chains, the AliExpress version did not use hollow pins. Its packaging was similar to the counterfeit eBay chain, featuring a glossy box finish and master links stored inside the same plastic bag as the chain.

    Lab Testing Fake Shimano Chains

    Best Bike Chain Lubes

    The controlled wear and strength testing for these three “Shimano” chains was carried out by Adam Kerin of Zero Friction Cycling.

    For the wear testing, Kerin uses a purpose-built rig that drives a Shimano drivetrain with a 250-watt motor while mounted on an indoor trainer. The chains are run through a series of 1,000 km test blocks designed to replicate real-world riding conditions as closely as possible in a controlled environment.

    Before testing began, all chains were stripped back to bare metal and treated with the control lubricant, Finish Line Dry. While this is a widely used lubricant, it’s known to perform poorly in wear testing compared to many modern alternatives (here’s my list of the best bike chain lubes).

    A chain is deemed worn out once it reaches 0.5% elongation, which is the commonly accepted replacement point for modern drivetrains.

    Chain strength was assessed using a dedicated test fixture that measures tensile strength under increasing load. In this test, a hydraulic ram applies force to a short loop of chain until permanent deformation or failure occurs. The resulting force is then compared against established industry standards.

    Current ISO standards require bicycle chains to achieve a minimum tensile strength of 8,000 Newtons. In some markets, a newer European standard (EN) is also being adopted, raising the minimum requirement to a more demanding 9,200 Newtons.

    Wear Test Results

    Distance Until 0.5% WornChain Wear Difference vs Genuine
    Genuine Shimano Chain3500 kmBaseline
    AliExpress Fake Shimano Chain1000 km3.5x faster wear
    eBay Fake Shimano Chain800 km4.4x faster wear

    The wear test results are nothing short of staggering. The genuine Shimano HG901-11 chain lasted between 3.5 and 4.4 times longer than the counterfeit chains tested.

    This matters because chain wear doesn’t occur in isolation. As a chain elongates, it accelerates wear on the cassette and chainrings too. In other words, the apparent savings of a cheaper counterfeit chain can quickly disappear once the increased drivetrain wear is taken into account.

    The genuine Shimano chain reached 0.5% wear after 3,500 kilometres of testing. Given that the Finish Line lubricant used in this test is generally regarded as a relatively poor performer in wear testing, that result seems quite good.

    Interestingly, despite arriving with the worst manufacturing tolerances and already measuring around 25% worn when new, the AliExpress chain actually outlasted the counterfeit eBay chain. That said, a lifespan of just 1,000 kilometres is still exceptionally poor by modern drivetrain standards.

    The counterfeit eBay chain delivered the worst result of all, reaching 0.5% wear after only 800 kilometres. That’s an astonishingly short lifespan and highlights just how poor some counterfeit chains can be. Anyone unknowingly buying one of these chains is likely paying far more in replacement parts and drivetrain wear than they realise.

    Strength Test Results

    Newtons Until FailureForce Difference vs Genuine
    Genuine Shimano Chain9,370 NBaseline
    AliExpress Fake Shimano Chain7,960 N15% Less Force
    eBay Fake Shimano Chain7,550 N19% Less Force

    After being subjected to the hydraulic ram test, the genuine Shimano chain was the only sample to meet the ISO minimum tensile strength requirement of 8,000 N. It was also the only chain to exceed the more stringent European (EN) standard of 9,200 N.

    Both counterfeit chains fell well short of these benchmarks. The AliExpress chain required 15% less force to cause failure, while the eBay chain required 19% less force. Neither chain met the minimum safety standard.

    The amount of permanent deformation was also measured after applying a 5,000 N load. The genuine Shimano chain showed no measurable deformation whatsoever. By comparison, the AliExpress chain was permanently stretched by 0.11 mm, while the eBay chain fared worst at 0.38 mm.

    What’s particularly striking is that these measurements were taken after the wear testing had already been completed. The genuine Shimano chain had accumulated 3.5x more kilometres than the counterfeit chains before entering the strength test, yet it still demonstrated the highest tensile strength and the greatest resistance to permanent deformation.

    How Can You Avoid Buying a Fake Shimano Chain?

    Top to bottom: A genuine Shimano chain, an eBay chain and an AliExpress chain. Image: Escape Collective

    Unfortunately, there is no foolproof way to identify a counterfeit Shimano chain from its packaging alone. Counterfeiters have become increasingly sophisticated, and many fake chains now look remarkably convincing at first glance.

    That said, there are a few details that may help raise suspicion.

    Both the AliExpress and eBay counterfeit chains tested here arrived in boxes with a noticeably glossier finish than the genuine packaging. One simple check is to mark the box with a permanent marker. On the counterfeit packaging, the ink tends to smudge much more easily than on the authentic box.

    The UPC barcode on the rear of the packaging was another distinguishing feature. On the genuine Shimano chain, the barcode was applied as a separate sticker, whereas both counterfeit chains had the barcode printed directly onto the box (please note that other genuine Shimano chain models print a barcode on the box).

    The packaging of the quick link may also provide a clue. The genuine Shimano chain packaged the quick link separately from the chain itself, while both counterfeit chains included the quick link inside the same plastic bag as the chain.

    However, these differences should not be treated as definitive proof of authenticity. Counterfeit products evolve constantly, and packaging details can change over time. The safest approach is to purchase Shimano chains from reputable bike shops and well-established retailers with a direct relationship to Shimano.

    Summary

    This test examined just three chains, but the results paint a worrying picture of the counterfeit Shimano chains currently on the market. Despite looking very similar to the genuine product, the fake chains performed dramatically worse.

    The counterfeit Shimano chains wear out 3.5 to 4.4 times faster than the genuine chain, require 15 to 19% less force to fail, and are likely to deliver poorer shifting performance due to their looser manufacturing tolerances.

    If you’re buying a Shimano chain, it’s worth purchasing from a large, reputable bike retailer. I’d avoid marketplace platforms such as Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, and Temu, where counterfeit products are commonly sold by third-party vendors. Be especially cautious of prices that seem too good to be true.

    And lastly, stay up to date with the latest signs of counterfeit Shimano products, as counterfeiters are constantly refining both their chains and packaging.

  • Rwenzori Mountains Hike: 5 Days in Africa’s Surreal Alpine Wilderness

    Rwenzori Mountains Hike: 5 Days in Africa’s Surreal Alpine Wilderness

    Thousands of metres above the hot and humid jungles of East Africa are the Rwenzori glaciers. It wasn’t until I picked up a magazine at an airport about a decade ago that I even knew Africa had glaciers, let alone equatorial ones, where snow and ice feel almost impossible.

    While the glaciers are quite cool, I really made the trip to these mountains because they’re home to one of the strangest alpine landscapes on Earth. Above 4000 metres lies an ancient world of giant prehistoric plants, endless bogs, and icy peaks.

    In this video and written article, we’ll spend five days hiking through the vegetation zones of the Rwenzori Mountains – from dense tropical jungle to bare rock high above the clouds. This should give you a sense of what it’s actually like to trek through one of Africa’s most surreal mountain ranges.

    Kilembe to Sine Camp

    The first vegetation zone of the Rwenzori Mountains is the evergreen forest. This ecosystem is common throughout the region and hosts countless flowers and an explosion of butterflies. It’s not exactly peaceful in here; the noise of cicadas can be deafening.

    We saw black and white colobus monkeys playing in the trees, along with curious blue monkeys, and speedy squirrels running up and down limbs. Against the green forest backdrop, we witnessed bright flashes of crimson erupting through the canopy whenever turacos took flight. There are chimpanzees in these forests too, and while I wasn’t so lucky this time, I did stumble upon some in a nearby forest and was shocked at just how loud they are in real life.

    rwenzori chameleon

    The ant colonies in the Rwenzoris were unbelievable. You could sometimes see millions and millions of them covering the ground as far as the eye could see. In terms of reptiles, I managed to find a lone chameleon, although it’s the colourful horned chameleons that I have my sights set on seeing.

    It wasn’t long until the light rain stopped, and by now the hiking became very picturesque. Small streams criss-crossed the trail, and every tree was draped in mosses and lichens of every imaginable texture. Fungi exploded from every fallen branch, while giant ferns, tangled vines and strange tropical fruits crowded every patch of forest floor.

    Sine Camp to Mutinda Camp

    As we climbed up in elevation, clouds rolled in around us, and we were now in the bamboo zone.

    Any panoramic views were now gone, with mist covering over trees draped in bearded moss. This gave the forest an enchanted feel; you almost expect to find a fairy sitting on a toadstool somewhere. And hidden amongst all of this enchantment was evidence of an apex predator with an almost mythical presence in these mountains. We found the poo of a leopard!

    The bamboo forest slowly gave way to a ghost forest of giant heather trees. Their twisted branches were sometimes buried beneath moss so thick and soft that it seemed impossible the branches could support the weight. Some hanging plants even resembled underwater coral reefs more than anything terrestrial. Old ladders and bridges made traversing the terrain that little bit easier, and their state of disrepair only made the forest feel more magical.

    The Rwenzoris are known locally as the rain maker, and they have a well-earned reputation for being relentlessly wet. With permanent soil moisture and ancient peat underneath, the mountains support some botanical wonders.

    The giant lobelia can exceed a metre in diameter, and its overlapping strap-shaped leaves are arranged with mathematical precision, helping the plant survive nightly freezes at these elevations. These plants are sometimes called living thermoses because water trapped within the rosette can remain unfrozen long after temperatures drop below zero. And when flowering, the lobelias send giant spikes three or four metres into the air, forming dense towers of alien-looking flowers emerging through the mist.

    The valley opened up, and the clouds lifted just enough to reveal rocky towers rising around us. It was the first time the landscape truly felt grandiose — and it wouldn’t be the last.

    Ultra fluffy rock hyraxes sat on the side of the trail pretending we didn’t exist as they took in rare moments of sunshine.

    Unfortunately, there was little to see at Mutinda lookout, but we waited out the clouds for a short while to see the interesting rock formations and the epic boardwalks up the boggy valley ahead.

    These mist-covered mountains are actually thought to be the legendary Mountains of the Moon, described more than 1,500 years ago by the astronomer Ptolemy, who believed they were the source of the Nile. While they may no longer be considered the Nile’s furthest or largest source, they are almost certainly its highest.

    Mutinda Camp to Bugata Camp

    At these high altitudes, the boardwalks are extensive. On a crisp, clear morning like this, with sunbirds darting between frost-covered lobelia flowers, these boardwalks must be one of the most spectacular trekking experiences anywhere in Africa.

    These bog bridges protect the underlying peat from damage, helping to preserve the sensitive ecosystem. On the sections without them, I actually felt quite guilty stepping on plants that could take an entire decade to rejuvenate.

    Clouds typically build mid-morning, so we were back in the misty, enchanted forests once again.

    In the afro-alpine moorland, tussock grasses take over. You need to jump from tussock to tussock, as there is no other way to avoid the deep mud between them. It genuinely takes all of your concentration to avoid losing a rubber boot to the bog, and with noticeably less oxygen at 4000 metres, it becomes surprisingly exhausting.

    Of course, this is much more difficult for the porters, who have to carry significantly more gear than us.

    Bugata Camp to Kiharo Camp

    Our earliest start came on day four, when we set off to summit Weismann’s Peak. The temperature hovered around freezing, with frost coating the ground, and the sound of crunching footsteps echoing through the valley. As the sun rose, the lakes below turned glassy and perfectly still, reflecting the alpine peaks towering above them with mirror precision.

    Higher up, the endless mud finally disappeared, and the trail became a scramble over giant boulders and fractured rocks. Lobelias and groundsels filled narrow ravines, perched atop moss-covered boulders that had likely crashed into the ravine millions of years ago.

    At this altitude, every step felt noticeably harder. The reduced oxygen slowed everything down, and the route occasionally vanished amongst the rocks entirely. But every time the clouds briefly opened, the view down to the lakes below was enough to keep pulling me upward.

    The transition from the final struggling groundsels to bare rock and ice is abrupt. It’s a biological frontier of sorts — the point beyond which no shrub or tree can survive.

    Weismann’s Peak didn’t quite have the glacier views I was hoping for, but I occasionally caught them reflecting faint light back through the clouds. Like glaciers almost everywhere on Earth, the ice atop the Rwenzoris is disappearing rapidly.

    The above photographs show how dramatically a glacier on Mt Stanley has retreated over the last century. But even more alarming is how much the West Stanley Glacier has vanished in just the last ten years alone. If you want to see Africa’s last glaciers for yourself, you genuinely need to come soon. Many scientists believe they could disappear entirely within the next decade.

    The descent from Weismann’s peak follows a distinctly worn rock pathway past small ponds and larger lakes. The cliffs surrounding the valley almost looked geometric at times, before the trail disappeared once again into deep rock ravines that funnel water from the highest lakes down to the flatlands.

    Whenever the valleys opened up, the scenery became almost absurdly dramatic. Jagged cliffs with water flowing down them rose above the lakes, and giant plants filled the valley floor. At times, it felt less like hiking through Africa and more like wandering through the set of a science fiction film.

    The densest stands of tree groundsels were found at high altitude. I’ve mentioned these plants a few times now; their silhouette is unmistakable: they have a cabbage-like crown atop a shaggy, dead-leaf trunk. The plant retains its old leaves as insulating armour around the stem. These groundsels grow as tall as six metres, and people often compare them to something out of the movie Avatar.

    Heather trees were mixed into the landscape, supporting a diverse microcosm of mosses, lichen and fungi.

    Kiharo Camp to Kilembe

    The final day started off incredibly muddy, but by now, I was getting used to finding the firmest places to place my feet. My skills in the mud are nothing compared to my guides, who knew the trail so well they could find all the rocks, logs and grasses completely submerged under water.

    Perhaps it was because we were moving fast, or maybe it was because we’d already spent a lot of time in the lower vegetation zones, but the valley we descended didn’t feel as magical as just days earlier. There were still flashes of brilliance, and the cascading waterfalls were spectacular at times. But in place of trees, dense three-metre-high bushes have now taken over parts of the national park, choking out almost everything beneath them. This was much more prevalent in this valley than in the one we climbed.

    Still, it felt great to see the myriad of birds, monkeys, butterflies and flowers reappear as we moved down through the vegetation zones.

    Most hikers know about Mount Kilimanjaro, and some know about Mount Kenya. But very few know that the Rwenzori Mountains are also snow-capped, equatorial, greater than 5000 metres tall… and far wilder.

    The Rwenzoris remain relatively untouched because they’re difficult, wet, remote, and logistically complicated. But those exact challenges are also what make the experience feel so special.

    Ultimately, all of it feels worthwhile for the chance to walk through landscapes this unique and to witness Africa’s last remaining glaciers before they disappear forever.

    Notes on the Rwenzori Mountains Hike

    Travelling here with the mandatory expedition team can initially feel excessive, especially if you’re used to hiking independently. But the system employs huge numbers of local porters and guides, it supports nearby communities, and limits the overall number of hikers entering these fragile high-altitude ecosystems.

    Expect to pay around US $200 per day to be in the Rwenzori Mountains, including the national park fees, guides, meals, accommodation etc.

    You may have noticed that I’ve been wearing rubber boots for the entire hike. These are provided when you arrive, and are more-or-less essential above 3500 metres. After wearing them for a while, I ended up developing a serious respect for them. They have excellent grip and relatively decent breathability due to the large opening at the top. I never got any blisters from them, but I will say the bottoms of my feet were a bit tender after the long descent on the final day.

    There are three main routes through the Rwenzori Mountains: the Central Circuit (run by Rwenzori Mountaineering Services), the Bukurungu Trail (run by Bujuku Eco Tours), and the Kilembe Trail (run by Rwenzori Trekking Services). The route featured in this article is the Kilembe Trail.

    From what I’ve heard, all three hikes are equally rewarding, although the Bukurungu Trail requires camping instead of staying in huts. This will be something that will either attract or deter certain hikers!

  • The 8 Best Power Banks With Fast Charging For Bike Touring & Bikepacking

    The 8 Best Power Banks With Fast Charging For Bike Touring & Bikepacking

    You might assume all power banks perform much the same, but there are major differences in charging speed, usable capacity, size, and weight. A big reason for this is how quickly battery technology has improved over the past decade.

    I’ve been charging my phone from a front hub dynamo since around 2010, but these days it makes far less practical sense. The best power banks now cost less than $100, can recharge from empty in under an hour, and offer far more convenience for most trips.

    In this guide, I’ll explain everything you need to know about charging your devices on the road, before diving into lab-tested data to identify the best power banks for bike touring and bikepacking.

    Let’s dive in.

    The Best Power Banks Available Today

    6 Reasons Fast Charging Is A Game Changer

    1. You can stop at a café or restaurant for just an hour and leave with enough energy to power your devices for the next few days. This gives you much more flexibility with where you go and where you sleep, as you no longer need to find a plug overnight.
    2. They are handy in campgrounds, where outlets are often limited or awkwardly located (sometimes in bathrooms). A fast-charging battery cuts the time you need to hover around a socket to just 30 or 45 minutes.
    3. You can get by with a single wall charger. Because the power bank recharges so quickly, you can then use it to top up your other devices without needing multiple wall adapters. My partner and I actually share a single charger between us when touring.
    4. Fast charging power banks are perfect for ultra-racing, where time off the bike is kept to an absolute minimum. After just 1 to 2 hours at a wall outlet, ultra racers can bank enough energy for two full smartphone charges and roughly 9.5 hours of runtime for a 600-lumen front light.
    5. In regions with frequent power cuts, such as parts of Africa, the ability to quickly store a large amount of energy is invaluable before the electricity inevitably drops again.
    6. Charging your devices via a battery rather than directly from the wall can also offer some protection from power surges where the grid flicks on and off in quick succession.

    Battery Capacity Is Not What You Think

    Before we get into the best power banks for bikepacking, it’s worth learning a bit about how batteries work and the numbers behind them.

    Battery capacity for power banks is most commonly listed in milliamp hours (mAh). The problem is that your 20,000 mAh power bank doesn’t actually have 20,000 mAh of capacity available.

    That’s because the advertised number is based on the battery’s internal voltage, not the voltage available at the USB port. So, when that energy is converted to USB voltage, the available capacity drops by roughly 25%. On top of that, voltage conversion isn’t perfectly efficient, so additional energy is lost in the process.

    When we add up these losses, your power bank usually has only about 60 to 65% of its rated capacity.

    Example: A power bank rated at 20,000 mAh at 3.7V converts to roughly 14,800 mAh at 5V. Assuming an 85% conversion efficiency, that comes out to around 12,580 mAh that can actually be delivered to your devices.

    Variations in Available Capacity

    The efficiency of converting energy from the battery cells to the USB port can vary widely too. An 85% conversion efficiency is typical for most batteries, but depending on the brand and model, it can be much lower.

    The worst case I’ve seen was a so-called 40,000 mAh power bank that only delivered 14,000 mAh at the USB port – just 34% of the rated capacity. Measurements like this are why you should not always trust manufacturer specs on batteries.

    In this resource, I’m listing the measured available capacities for all the batteries I recommend, so you know exactly how much energy these power banks can deliver to your device.

    Note: the battery capacities were measured in a lab environment in watt-hours (Wh) but have been converted to mAh at 5V for easier comparison.

    Power Bank Charging Speeds

    Anker makes power banks and wall chargers that can charge at 140 watts.

    Another key term to understand is watts (W), which is used to describe charge and discharge speeds. Power banks vary dramatically in how quickly they recharge. Some small units trickle in at around 10W, while the fastest models can reach 140W, which means they fill around 14 times faster.

    I recommend choosing a battery that can recharge at between 30 and 60W. At 60W, just an hour at a café is often enough to stock up on power for several days.

    It’s important to remember that charging slows as the battery approaches full capacity. Most power banks reach 50% charge in roughly 40% of the total time, with the remaining 60% used to reach full capacity.

    We can benchmark charging speed by calculating how many milliamp-hours (mAh) a power bank can gain per minute plugged into the wall. In my tests, the fastest power bank averaged around 300 mAh per minute, while the slowest managed only 34 mAh per minute.

    As a general rule, larger batteries charge more than twice as fast as smaller batteries. Most 20,000 mAh models recharge at 80 to 130 mAh per minute, whereas 10,000 mAh units typically manage only 40 to 50 mAh per minute.

    Power Bank Discharging Speeds

    Discharge speeds are important too, as some power banks can charge your smartphone several times faster than others. That said, I’ll only recommend models in this resource that support the fastest charging speeds most smartphones can handle (roughly 20W).

    But it’s worth noting that three of the power banks on my list can discharge fast enough to charge a laptop at full speed. That’s 100W or more!

    Wall Chargers

    Your wall charger also needs to match your power bank. If your battery can charge at 140W but you’re using a 25W wall plug, you’re not making good use of the ultra-fast charging.

    • If you’re selecting a battery that accepts 20W input, a Belkin charger block is just US $10 on Amazon and will do the job.
    • For fast-charging, I recommend the Anker 70W wall charger. It has 3 USB ports, a foldout plug, and weighs just 120 grams (4.2 oz). It will charge most of the recommended power banks featured below in under two hours, and is fast enough for most laptops. You can find it for US $39 on Amazon.
    • If you need a versatile charger that can power a laptop and other devices at the same time – or quickly top up a high-speed power bank, the Anker 140W wall charger is an excellent choice. It has four USB ports, a foldout plug, and an interactive screen that shows live charge rates. It’s a great bit of kit that I use personally, and it’s US $89 on Amazon.

    Are 10,000 or 20,000 mAh Power Banks Better?

    For bike touring and bikepacking, the sweet spot is typically a 20,000 mAh power bank. This size usually supports much faster charging, anywhere from 2 to 7 times faster than 10,000 mAh models.

    A 20,000 mAh power bank can fully recharge a modern smartphone about 3 to 4 times. If you need even more power, I’d recommend carrying two 20,000 mAh units rather than looking for anything larger.

    The 8 Best Power Banks With Fast Charging

    Anker 737 (Fastest Charging)

    • Usable capacity: 14,400 mAh 14% MORE THAN TYPICAL
    • Max charge speed: 140W 7X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Full battery charge time: 48 mins 7.7X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Average capacity gained per minute: 300 mAh 7.7X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Max USB output: 140W 7X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Number of full iPhone 17 charges: 3.9 15% MORE THAN TYPICAL
    • Weight: 628 grams 80% HEAVIER THAN TYPICAL
    • Energy density: 22.9 mAh per gram 37% LOWER THAN TYPICAL
    • Price: $94 on Amazon

    The Anker 737 is by far the fastest-charging power bank on this list, refilling itself 8× faster than a typical battery of its size. It’s the one I personally use for bike touring because it offers me the greatest charging flexibility.

    It also has a slightly larger capacity than most of the others, putting you closer to four full smartphone charges rather than the more typical 3.5.

    You get three ports in total – two USB-C and one USB-A. The LCD screen is a great feature. With a press of the side button, you can view real-time charge and discharge speeds in watts, which makes it easy to monitor performance.

    On the output side, it can deliver up to 140W, making it ideal for charging laptops. In regions with frequent power cuts, I’ve used the 737 to keep my laptop running while also buffering it from potential power surges.

    The trade-off for that blazing charge and discharge speed is size, weight, and cost. It’s one of the largest, heaviest, and most expensive options here, and its brick-like shape isn’t quite as pack-friendly as slimmer designs.

    You can find the Anker 737 on Amazon HERE.

    Baseus Blade 20000 (Fast and Compact)

    • Usable capacity: 13,400 mAh 6% MORE THAN TYPICAL
    • Max charge speed: 60W 3X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Full battery charge time: 1h 45mins 3.5X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Average capacity gained per minute: 128 mAh 3.8X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Max USB output: 100W 5X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Number of full iPhone 17 charges: 3.6 5% MORE THAN TYPICAL
    • Weight: 443 grams 21% HEAVIER THAN TYPICAL
    • Energy density: 30.2 mAh per gram 17% LOWER THAN TYPICAL
    • Price: $89 on Amazon

    The Baseus Blade takes a very different approach from the Anker 737, using a wide, flat form factor that slips neatly into a backpack pocket or laptop sleeve. At just 18mm (0.7″) thick, it’s impressively slim for a high-capacity power bank.

    This is the power bank I would choose if I didn’t already have a 140W wall charger for my laptop, as it’s lighter and much thinner than the Anker 737.

    Don’t let the shape fool you; the charging performance is excellent. The Blade recharges around 3× faster than a typical power bank, going from empty to full in just 1 hour and 45 minutes. Plus, you can use a smaller and lighter 60W charging plug.

    You get four ports in total (two USB-C and two USB-A), along with an LED display that shows real-time charging information. The data is presented in volts and amps rather than watts, but you can still monitor battery percentage and see the estimated time to full or empty while in use.

    On the output side, it can deliver power at up to five times the speed of a typical battery, making it a good option for laptop charging. It also offers a slightly higher usable capacity than most power banks in this size category, helping you squeeze more charges from each refill.

    You can find the Baseus Blade on Amazon HERE.

    Nitecore NB20000 (Highest Energy Density)

    • Usable capacity: 12,940 mAh 2% MORE THAN TYPICAL
    • Max charge speed: 30W 1.5X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Full battery charge time: 4h 21mins 1.4X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Average capacity gained per minute: 49.6 mAh 1.5X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Max USB output: 45W 2.3X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Number of full iPhone 17 charges: 3.5 3% MORE THAN TYPICAL
    • Weight: 291 grams 7% LIGHTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Energy density: 44.5 mAh per gram 9% HIGHER THAN TYPICAL
    • Price: $99 on Amazon

    If maximum energy density is your priority, the Nitecore NB20000 is the clear choice – it’s the most energy-dense battery on this list. Thanks to its high-density lithium cells and carbon-fibre reinforced polymer shell, it’s about 27% lighter than the Baseus Blade, while offering almost identical capacity.

    The main trade-off is charging speed. The NB20000 refills at just 50 mAh per minute, making it roughly 2.5× slower than the Baseus Blade and 6× slower than the Anker 737. It also relies on simple indicator LEDs to show remaining charge, displayed in roughly 25% increments, rather than a detailed screen.

    Port selection is another compromise. The power bank includes two USB-C ports and two USB-A ports, but one of the USB-C ports is input-only, meaning you can’t charge devices from it. As a result, dual USB-C output isn’t possible.

    Ultimately, if you typically have around four hours to recharge and minimising weight is a top priority, this remains one of the best ultralight options available.

    You can find the Nitecore NB20000 on Amazon HERE.

    UGREEN 20000 100W (Alternate Fast Charge)

    • Usable capacity: 11,820 mAh 6% LESS THAN TYPICAL
    • Max charge speed: 65W 3.3X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Full battery charge time: 1h 36mins 3.4X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Average capacity gained per minute: 123.1 mAh 3.6X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Max USB output: 100W 5X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Number of full iPhone 17 charges: 3.2 5% LESS THAN TYPICAL
    • Weight: 421 grams 17% HEAVIER THAN TYPICAL
    • Energy density: 28.1 mAh per gram 23% LOWER THAN TYPICAL
    • Price: $56 on Amazon

    Another excellent fast-charging option is the UGREEN 20000. It’s faster to recharge, lighter, and cheaper than the Baseus Blade, making it a very appealing alternative. That said, its usable capacity is about 12% lower than the Blade’s, so you won’t have quite as much power on hand.

    The UGREEN has two USB-C ports and one USB-A port, all of which can be used simultaneously. On the output side, it can deliver power at up to five times the speed of a typical battery, making it well-suited for laptop charging.

    The main drawback is the display. Unlike more expensive models, it doesn’t provide detailed per-port input and output data, so you can’t see exactly how much power your devices are drawing. Instead, it has a minimalist screen that simply shows the remaining battery percentage.

    You can find the UGREEN 20000 on Amazon HERE.

    INIU P51 20000 (Budget Power Bank)

    • Usable capacity: 12,660 mAh
    • Max charge speed: 20W
    • Full battery charge time: 6h 11mins
    • Average capacity gained per minute: 34.1 mAh
    • Max USB output: 22.5W
    • Number of full iPhone 17 charges: 3.4
    • Weight: 314 grams
    • Energy density: 40.3 mAh per gram
    • Price: $24 on Amazon

    INIU may not be a brand many are familiar with, but it makes some of the best power accessories on the market for the price, and its power banks offer a lot of bang for the buck.

    If you usually charge overnight and don’t need ultra-fast charging, the INIU 20000 20W is an excellent value battery. At just a third to a quarter of the price of most competing 20,000 mAh power banks, it’s one of the most cost-effective ways to carry this much storage capacity. And if you need even more capacity, buying two still keeps you ahead on cost.

    These power banks are also very energy-dense, offering 40 mAh per gram, placing them just behind the Nitecore models. That’s impressive for the cheapest option on this list. On top of that, the INIU has a solid usable capacity, enough for roughly 3.4 full iPhone 17 charges.

    The main downside is that there’s a single USB-C port (and two USB-A ports), which may limit how many devices you can charge at once.

    You can find the INIU P51-E2 on Amazon HERE.

    Anker Nano 3-in-1 (Power Bank With Wall Plug)

    • Usable capacity: 5,400 mAh 8% LESS THAN TYPICAL
    • Max charge speed: 30W 1.6X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Full battery charge time: 1h 20mins 1.9X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Average capacity gained per minute: 67.5 mAh 1.8X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Max USB output: 30W 1.5X FASTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Number of full iPhone 17 charges: 1.5 7% LESS THAN TYPICAL
    • Weight: 250 grams 28% HEAVIER THAN TYPICAL
    • Energy density: 21.6 mAh per gram 28% LOWER THAN TYPICAL
    • Price: $34 on Amazon

    The Anker Nano packs a lot of convenience into a compact package. It features a built-in USB-C or Apple Lightning cable, a USB-C port, and a foldable wall plug for direct charging. The LED display is simple, showing only charge/discharge status and remaining percentage, but it gets the job done.

    The price is on the higher side, but I haven’t found another 3-in-1 option that comes close in charging speed. It’s roughly 1.6× faster than our benchmark and more than twice as fast as most 10,000 mAh power banks.

    With the combination of a wall plug, integrated cable, and excellent charging speeds, the Anker beats everything else in this size class.

    You can find the Anker Nano 3-In-1 on Amazon HERE.

    Nitecore NB10000 (Lightest Power Bank)

    • Usable capacity: 5,840 mAh SAME AS TYPICAL
    • Max charge speed: 18W SAME AS TYPICAL
    • Full battery charge time: 2h 36mins SAME AS TYPICAL
    • Average capacity gained per minute: 37.4 mAh SAME AS TYPICAL
    • Max USB output: 18W 9% SLOWER THAN TYPICAL
    • Number of full iPhone 17 charges: 1.6 SAME AS TYPICAL
    • Weight: 153 grams 22% LIGHTER THAN TYPICAL
    • Energy density: 38.2 mAh per gram 27% HIGHER THAN TYPICAL
    • Price: $59 on Amazon

    If your top priority is carrying the lightest power bank, the Nitecore NB10000 is hard to beat. Designed for low weight and compact size (smaller than an iPhone), it’s a favourite among thru-hikers and bikepackers.

    It weighs just 153 grams, it delivers roughly 1.6 full iPhone charges, and the discharge speed is fast enough to charge most smartphones at full rate.

    The Nitecore uses simple charging lights to indicate battery level. Press the on button to see the charge in 25% increments, and the lights turn off automatically after about 10 seconds.

    With two ports and a 10,000 mAh capacity, the Nitecore can charge two devices at once or provide pass-through charging (charging a device while the power bank itself is charging).

    You can find the Nitecore NB10000 on Amazon HERE.

    VRURC Square (Power Bank With Cables)

    • Usable capacity: 5,860 mAh
    • Max charge speed: 18.6W
    • Full battery charge time: 2h 31mins
    • Average capacity gained per minute: 48.8 mAh
    • Max USB output: 19.9W
    • Number of full iPhone 17 charges: 1.6
    • Weight: 195 grams
    • Energy density: 30.1 mAh per gram
    • Price: $21 on Amazon

    Finally, if you want to skip carrying extra charging cables, the VRURC Square is a solid choice. It comes with all the common cables built in (USB-A, USB-C, Micro-USB, and Lightning) along with the standard USB-C and USB-A ports.

    The VRURC is inexpensive, recharges from the wall at a decent pace, and provides enough output to fast-charge a smartphone about 1.5 times.

    Its design is slim, compact, and lightweight, with a textured grip to prevent slipping, and the digital LED screen shows the remaining battery percentage at the press of a button.

    Overall, it’s an affordable choice for anyone who just needs a little extra pocket power to get through the day.

    You can find the VRURC Square on Amazon HERE.

    Summary: Best Power Banks Table

    Charge Time (Min)Capacity Gained Per Minute (mAh)Weight (g)Price (USD)
    Anker 737: 24000 mAh48300628$94 on Amazon
    Baseus Blade: 20000 mAh105128443$89 on Amazon
    Nitecore NB: 20000 mAh26149.6327$99 on Amazon
    UGREEN 100W: 20000 mAh96123.1421$56 on Amazon
    INIU P51: 20000 mAh37134.1349$24 on Amazon
    Anker Nano 3in1: 10000 mAh8067.5250$34 on Amazon
    Nitecore NB: 10000 mAh15637.4153$59 on Amazon
    VRURC Square: 10000 mAh15148.8182$21 on Amazon

  • The 13 Best Touring Bikes You Can Buy In 2026

    The 13 Best Touring Bikes You Can Buy In 2026

    Bicycle touring is one of the most rewarding ways to see and experience the world. And since the bike shapes part of that experience, I’m going to show you the best touring bikes available, with both performance and price factored in.

    I’ll start by breaking down the key features that matter most on a touring bike. After that, I’ll show you the best models from the five main touring bike categories: long distance, around the world, trekking, off-road and light touring.

    Even if you don’t end up choosing my recommended models, you should come away with the knowledge you need to evaluate any touring bike. That’s whether it’s cheap, expensive, new or second-hand.

    How Did I Narrow Down The Options?

    I used the data found in my Touring Bicycle Buyer’s Guide to find the best bikes for the job.

    My guide teaches you everything you need to know about the bikes before allowing you to compare over 330 different models at the back of the book. And the best bit is that it’s updated yearly, for free, so you’ll always have the latest version.

    If you’d like to know more, there’s a ton more information about my guide on this page HERE.

    My Criteria For Finding the Best Touring Bikes

    Low Gear Ratios

    The first thing I analysed was the lowest climbing gear.

    Having sufficiently low gears is crucial for touring because it allows you to climb at a manageable speed, even with a fully loaded bike. If your gearing is too high, you’ll burn more energy than necessary, fatigue more quickly, and make every steep ascent feel harder than it needs to be.

    To compare the low gears of different touring bikes, I use a unit of measurement called gear inches. This standardises wheel size, tyre width, and drivetrain differences into a single number.

    Don’t worry about the fact that it’s in inches. Nothing ever gets converted, and you’ll find the numbers better to compare. A gear that’s 10% lower in gear inches is simply 10% easier to pedal.

    For on-road touring, I target 20 gear inches or below. For off-road riding, under 18 gear inches is ideal. In practice, the lower your gearing, the steeper the climbs you’ll be able to tackle comfortably.

    Frame Geometry

    Next, I looked at the frame geometry of each bike. My goal is to prioritise bikes that offer an upright riding position and stable handling.

    In practice, that means I’m focusing on longer chainstays and wheelbases, a tall stack height for comfort, and steering characteristics that suit the type of handlebar being used.

    Price To Performance

    The cheapest bike you’ll find on this list is US $1000. Image: Poseidon Bike

    Next, I narrowed the list by considering each bike’s price relative to the performance it delivers.

    Touring bikes take a beating, so I focused on price points where you’re most likely to get reliable components and good performance. In most cases, that sweet spot falls between US $1,000 and $2,500.

    If that’s still outside your budget, consider tracking down an older model of any of these bikes on the second-hand market. That way you’ll get excellent value without compromising on reliability.

    Frame Stiffness

    best touring bikes

    Frame stiffness is one of the defining characteristics of a true touring bike.

    Most touring setups have luggage at the front and rear of the bike, and the frame has to handle the twisting forces created between those two load points. If the frame isn’t stiff enough, the bike can feel unsettled and become more susceptible to speed wobbles.

    For consistent handling and stability, we want frames that are stiff without being overly heavy. Well-designed touring frames typically use oversized tubing to strike this balance, giving the bike a rock-solid feel when fully loaded.

    Tyre Clearance

    Touring bikes benefit enormously from wider tyres, especially because they need to support heavy loads and handle rough or unpredictable surfaces.

    Although narrow tyres work well on smooth pavement, wide slicks don’t actually slow you down much. They’re also significantly more comfortable while giving you access to far more terrain.

    For most paved-road touring setups, around 50 mm (2.0″) is the ideal width with fenders installed. This keeps your options open: you can run narrower tyres for pristine pavement, yet still have room for 2.20″ mountain bike tyres when the route gets rough.

    If you spend most of your time on dirt roads, going wider than 2.40″ (62 mm) will give you the best control, comfort, and long-term durability.

    Kickstand Mounts

    Victoire Voyage

    Finally, I favoured bikes that include dedicated kickstand mounts.

    It’s surprising how many touring bikes still lack a proper place to install one. Kickstands only weigh 250 grams (9 oz), and you’ll use them dozens of times a day. That’s when packing the bike, grabbing supplies, taking photos, or doing quick maintenance.

    Best Touring Bikes: Long Distance

    Long-distance touring bikes are built with enough stiffness to carry four large panniers, while using durable components that can handle the extra weight. They’re best suited to travel on smoother roads, but are still capable of tackling rougher surfaces when needed.

    Marin Four Corners 1

    • Climbing Gear: 21″ 5% Lower Than Average
    • Steering Speed: 69 mm 6% slower than average
    • Stack Average: 617 mm 18 mm taller than average
    • Weight: 13-14 kg or 29-31 lb 7% Lighter than Average
    • Tyre Clearance: 50 mm 11% Wider Than Average
    • Minimum Standover: 668 mm
    • Sizes: XS, S, M, L, XL
    • Price: US $1249

    The Marin Four Corners 1 has long been a popular steel touring bike, thanks to its very competitive price point.

    Equipped with the latest Microshift Sword groupset, the gear ratios are finally suited for touring. The bike offers a super-upright riding position thanks to a long head tube, and it features numerous mounting points for different luggage configurations.

    A smart feature is that the extra-small and small sizes use 650B wheels instead of 700C, which helps minimise toe overlap. The XS frame will actually fit riders as small as 150cm or 4’11″, thanks to its super low standover height.

    There is a kickstand mount at the rear dropout so you can easily pack and park your bike, and the Four Corners is available in two colours.

    If you’re doing any more mountainous trips, I would highly recommend fitting a CUES rear derailleur and an 11-42T cassette. These components pair perfectly with the current drivetrain and will take you up steeper roads.

    Want to know more?
    Head over to GearX.com to find additional specs, geometry charts, and how to place an order.

    Bombtrack Arise Tour

    • Climbing Gear: 20″ 10% Lower than average
    • Steering Speed: 66 mm Same as average
    • Stack Average: 570 mm 29 mm lower than average
    • Weight: 14-15 kg or 31-33 lb Same as average
    • Tyre Clearance: 42 mm 9% Narrower Than Average
    • Minimum Standover: 733 mm
    • Sizes: XS, S, M, L, XL
    • Price – US $2999 or €2499

    At the next price tier, the Bombtrack Arise Tour steps things up with a more premium frame and higher-end components, and it comes fully equipped with dynamo lighting, racks, and fenders. That does push the price higher, but keep in mind the accessories alone are valued at US $800. It’s roughly $400 for the dynamo system, $350 for Tubus racks, and $50 for the fenders.

    The steel frameset looks great and offers typical touring bike handling. I especially like the hidden spare spoke holder tucked inside the seatstay, and the use of smaller 650B wheels on the XS size to minimise toe overlap.

    The main frame drawback is the relatively low stack height. If you prefer a more upright position, you’ll need to achieve it with a riser drop bar like the Redshift Top Shelf or an extra high-rise stem.

    The frame also isn’t designed for a kickstand, but thanks to the seatstay-mounted rear brake caliper, you can easily fit a universal kickstand like the Pletscher Multiflex, which I’ve found works very well.

    Out of the box, the Arise Tour features a 2×10 drivetrain with a lower-than-average climbing gear. Braking is handled by TRP Spyre mechanical disc brakes paired with a 180 mm front rotor, delivering about 13% more stopping power than typical. These mechanical disc brakes are extra reliable and keep maintenance simple.

    Other reliable components include bar-end shifters. They take a bit of getting used to, but they can take a beating. A nice bonus is that you can switch them into friction mode if your shifting starts acting up.

    Want to know more?
    Head over to AngryCatfishBicycle.com to find additional specs, geometry charts, and how to place an order.

    Rockrider ADVT 900

    • Climbing Gear: 20″ Same as average
    • Steering Speed: 69 mm 3% faster than average
    • Stack Average: 610 mm 8 mm lower than average
    • Weight: 17-18 kg or 38-40 lb 6% heavier than average
    • Tyre Clearance: 50mm Same as average
    • Minimum Standover: 725 mm
    • Sizes: S, M, L, XL
    • Price: €1699

    Moving over to flat-bar touring bikes, the Rockrider ADVT 900 earns its place on this list thanks to its outstanding value.

    This bike is available through Decathlon, and it comes fully equipped straight out of the box: racks, fenders, dynamo lights, the ever-popular Brooks B17 saddle, durable Schwalbe touring tyres, and a long-lasting Shimano CUES drivetrain with a 20-inch climbing gear. This is about as good as it gets in this price range.

    The frame features long chainstays for stability and can support a 170 kg total load, which is around 40 kg more than most touring bikes.

    You can also charge your devices directly from the front dynamo hub using a USB port integrated into the steerer tube. Independent tests have shown that the Cycle2Charge system performs impressively at a speed of around 20 km/h.

    Want to know more?
    Head over to Decathlon.co.uk to find additional specs, geometry charts, and how to place an order.

    Best Touring Bikes: Around The World

    As the name suggests, Around-The-World touring bikes are intentionally overbuilt to handle very heavy loads with minimal risk of component failure, and they’re designed to perform on mixed terrain. They tend to be heavier than other touring bikes and often come equipped with a range of accessories right out of the box.

    Maxx Pacemaxx Tour

    strongest touring bikes
    • Climbing Gear: 14″ 30% lower than average
    • Steering Speed: 103 mm 40% Slower than average
    • Stack Average: 669 mm 51 mm taller than average
    • Weight: 18-19 kg or 40-42 lb 11% Heavier than average
    • Tyre Clearance: 2.4″ 22% Wider Than Average
    • Minimum Standover: 713 mm
    • Sizes: S, M, L, XL, XXL, 3XL
    • Price: €2199

    If you’re looking for a round-the-world touring bike without paying a premium price, it’s hard to beat the Maxx Pacemaxx Tour.

    This MTB-inspired touring bike is built around an exceptionally strong and stiff frame, with a total system weight rating of 180 kg. The Pacemaxx has a very long wheelbase combined with slow steering, helping it stay composed under a heavy load. The upright riding position delivers all-day comfort, and with six frame sizes, it can fit riders from 150 to 205 cm tall. I also like that the smooth welds and internal cable routing give the frame a more classy finish than most bikes at this price point.

    Out of the box, the Pacemaxx is ready for global travel, featuring durable tubeless wheels, dynamo lighting, Schwalbe touring tyres, and an ultra-low 14-inch climbing gear for steep hills. That’s 30% lower than most touring drivetrains!

    You can also configure the Pacemaxx from the ground up using Maxx’s configurator. Suspension forks, suspension seatposts, and a wide range of touring accessories can be added, and you can even choose from over 200 paint colours! There’s also the option to upgrade to a Rohloff 14-speed internal gear hub with a belt drive for around €1,500 extra.

    Want to know more?
    Head over to Maxx.de to find additional specs, geometry charts, and how to place an order.

    Best Touring Bikes: Trekking

    Trekking bikes are long-distance touring bikes built around a suspension fork, which adds comfort on rough dirt or cobblestone roads. The trade-offs are that front pannier racks are harder to fit, and the suspension fork requires regular maintenance to perform well.

    Cube Kathmandu EXC

    • Climbing Gear: 20″ Same as average
    • Steering Speed: 79 mm 3% Faster than average
    • Stack Average: 633 mm 3 mm taller than average
    • Weight: 15-16 kg or 33-35 lb Same As Average
    • Tyre Clearance: 50 mm 4% Wider Than Average
    • Minimum Standover: 785 mm
    • Sizes: 46, 50, 54, 58, 62
    • Price: €1499

    In terms of trekking bikes, the Cube Kathmandu EXC is an excellent option at a very attractive price.

    For a start, the Kathmandu comes loaded with touring essentials: dynamo lights, a rear rack, fenders, and a kickstand. It features a suspension fork up front that can be locked on smooth road sections, so you don’t waste pedal power.

    The Kathmandu is equipped well with a 20-inch climbing gear that’s suitable for most touring situations. Like the previous two bikes, it’s using the Shimano CUES 22-speed groupset, which is long-lasting and has a good gear range.

    The frame geometry delivers both an upright position and stable handling, keeping you comfortable. Shorter riders just need to watch out for the tall standover heights of the small-sized frames.

    Want to know more?
    Head over to Cube.eu to find additional specs, geometry charts, and how to place an order.

    Best Touring Bikes: Off-Road

    Off-road touring bikes are built with extra tyre clearance, lower gearing, and more stable steering. Their wheels tend to be stronger, and the frames usually come with additional mounting points for frame bags, cargo cages, and extra water bottles.

    Esker Lorax

    • Climbing Gear: 21″ Same as average
    • Steering Speed: 101 mm 15% Slower than average
    • Stack Average: 631 mm 13 mm taller than average
    • Weight: 13-14 kg or 29-31 lb 7% Heavier Than Average
    • Tyre Clearance: 2.60″ 4% Wider Than Average
    • Minimum Standover – 730 mm
    • Sizes – S, M, L, XL
    • Price – US $2200

    The Esker Lorax is one of a few drop-bar bikes that genuinely blur the line with a mountain bike. Its ultra-stable geometry, generous tyre clearance, and ability to run super low climbing gears give it proper off-road capability. This steel bike will fit a 2.6″ tyre at the rear, and up to a 3.0″ tyre up front, giving you ample traction and comfort.

    The Lorax puts you in a notably upright riding position, making it much easier to access the drops for long periods of time. That means better braking control and plenty of hand and body position options for long days in the saddle. The bars themselves are wider than most, offering more steering leverage for when the terrain gets technical.

    In terms of components, the Lorax comes with reliable Avid BB7 mechanical disc brakes, durable Maxxis Ikon tyres, and a comfortable Ergon gel saddle.

    On top of that, Esker offers plenty of component customisation. The stock Microshift Sword drivetrain can be upgraded to SRAM or Shimano. You can also upgrade wheels and brakes, add a dropper post, or even fit a suspension fork to tailor the Lorax to your preferred terrain.

    And if you’re looking for a good rear rack for panniers, the Old Man Mountain racks seem to fit best.

    Want to know more?
    Head over to Esker Bikes to find additional specs, geometry charts, and ordering information.

    Kona Unit X

    • Climbing Gear: 18″ Same As Average
    • Steering Speed: 98 mm 10% Slower than average
    • Stack Average: 602 mm 15 mm lower than average
    • Weight: 14-15 kg or 31-33 lb 5% Heavier Than Average
    • Tyre Clearance: 2.60″ Same As Average
    • Minimum Standover: 695 mm
    • Sizes: S, M, L, XL
    • Price: US $1799

    The Kona Unit X is a rugged off-road bike that has proven itself on long-distance adventures across continents.

    At under US $1,800, it comes with an 18-inch climbing gear, clearance for 29 x 2.6″ tyres, and all the key touring braze-ons, including mounts for fenders, cages, and racks.

    BIKE Magazine tested its lateral frame stiffness and found the Unit X to be the stiffest hardtail mountain bike ever measured. It was stiffer than any aluminium or carbon frame, making it ideal for carrying heavy loads.

    The main downside is a relatively low stack height, so a bar with extra rise might be needed for a comfortable, upright position. Rear-rack mounting can be awkward due to eyelet placement, but the Tubus Logo Evo mounts directly to the sliding dropout bolts, keeping cargo low and stable.

    One of the coolest features is its sliding dropout design, which makes it an excellent candidate for a Rohloff 14-speed hub conversion. You can even start with the singlespeed version to save $500, putting that money toward a Rohloff hub upgrade later.

    Want to know more?
    Head over to AngryCatfishBicycles.com to find additional specs, geometry charts, and ordering information.

    Tumbleweed Prospector

    • Climbing Gear: 16″ 10% lower than average
    • Steering Speed: 82mm 5% Faster than average
    • Stack Average: 632mm 9 mm taller than average
    • Weight: 16-17 kg or 35-37 lb Same As Average
    • Tyre Clearance: 3.80″ 26% Wider than Average
    • Minimum Standover: 772 mm
    • Sizes: S, M, L, XL
    • Price: US $4950

    If my videos have persuaded you that Rohloff hubs are a worthwhile investment, the Tumbleweed Prospector is a great off-road tourer.

    It’s the priciest bike on this list, but nearly half the cost comes from the Rohloff 14-speed internal gear hub. These robust hubs offer more gears and a wider range than a typical 1X drivetrain, all while keeping critical components sealed from the elements. That means minimal maintenance, less cleaning, and fewer gear adjustments.

    You can set these bikes up with 3.0” tyres on both 29” and 27.5” wheels. It even accommodates 27.5 x 3.8” tyres, which pushes it into fat bike territory. This flexibility lets you customise your Prospector based on what you want to do.

    It’s also suspension fork compatible, and it has mounts for racks, cargo cages, and fenders. The main drawbacks are the tall standover in small sizes and the price. But don’t worry, I’ve also got a gearbox-equipped option that’s easier on the wallet…

    Want to know more?
    Head over to Tumbleweed.cc to find additional specs, geometry charts, and ordering information.

    Priority Bruzer

    • Climbing Gear: 18″ Same as average
    • Steering Speed: 109 mm 21% slower than average
    • Stack Average: 618 mm 5 mm lower than average
    • Weight: 15-16 kg or 35-37 lb Same As Average
    • Tyre Clearance: 2.80″ Same As Average
    • Minimum Standover: 660 mm
    • Sizes: S, M, L, XL
    • Price: US $2499

    The Priority Bruzer is an off-road tourer built around a 12-speed Pinion gearbox. These fully sealed gearboxes are renowned for their durability and are often seen as the main alternative to the Rohloff hub.

    Pinion gearboxes offer some key advantages over Rohloff hubs, including a broader gear range, longer service intervals between oil changes, and a whisper-quiet operation. However, they also come with trade-offs: larger jumps between gears, added weight, and slightly reduced efficiency. If you’d like to know more, I have a video that compares them head-to-head.

    Instead of a traditional chain, the Bruzer uses a belt drive, which essentially eliminates the need for cleaning or lubrication. In the right conditions, belt sprockets can last over 30,000 km. That’s 3X the lifespan of a typical chain drivetrain.

    The Bruzer frame features a stable mountain bike geometry and fits up to 2.8″ wide tyres. As you’d expect from a capable touring bike, it includes all the mounting points needed for racks, cages, and accessories.

    And at US $2499, the Bruzer offers incredible value, especially when you consider that Pinion gearboxes alone retail for nearly $2000.

    Want to know more?
    Head over to PriorityBicycles.com to find additional specs, geometry charts, and how to place an order.

    Best Touring Bikes: Gravel & Light Touring

    Light touring bikes are designed to be lighter and faster on smoother surfaces. They aren’t as stiff or durable as long-distance touring bikes, but will comfortably handle 10kg of luggage or so.

    Poseidon X Gen 3

    • Climbing Gear: 22″ 12% lower than average
    • Steering Speed: 73mm 4% slower than average
    • Stack Average: 597mm 7 mm taller than average
    • Weight: 10-11 kg or 22-24 lb 9% Lighter than Average
    • Tyre Clearance: 45mm 8% Narrower Than Average
    • Minimum Standover: 775 mm
    • Sizes: S, M, L, XL, XXL
    • Price: US $999

    The Poseidon X Gen 3 is the best budget light touring bike.

    This aluminium bike weighs only 10.2 kg and comes equipped with a full carbon fork, which is virtually unheard of at this price point. The fork alone saves 400 to 800 grams compared to typical aluminium or steel forks.

    Every component of the Poseidon is designed for faster rides with a light load. It features the microSHIFT Sword 1×10 groupset and Tektro mechanical disc brakes, which are easy to maintain while touring.

    But speed isn’t the only focus. The bike also offers an excellent 22″ low climbing gear for steep hills and a comfortable upright riding position. It’s also tubeless-ready, helping to minimise punctures on the road.

    The main downside is the lack of full fender mounts. However, the SKS SpeedRocker XL clip-on mudguards should work perfectly as an alternative.

    Want to know more?
    Head over to PoseidonBike.com to find additional specs, geometry charts, and how to place an order.

    Focus Atlas 6.8 EQP

    best touring bikes
    • Climbing Gear: 22″ 12% lower than average
    • Steering Speed: 70mm Same as average
    • Stack Average: 593 mm 5 mm taller than average
    • Weight: 13-14 kg or 29-31 lb 15% Heavier Than Average
    • Tyre Clearance: 48 mm Same As Average
    • Minimum Standover: 757 mm
    • Sizes: XS, S, M, L, XL
    • Price: €1999

    If you’re after a fast, lightweight touring bike that comes equipped with dynamo lights, fenders, a kickstand and a rear rack, the Focus Atlas 6.8 EQP is an excellent choice.

    Its frame was measured as the stiffest gravel bike ever tested by Tour Magazin, coming in more than 10% stiffer than any other model. This is a major advantage when you’re carrying luggage. If you’d like to see the other top-performing frames, I’ve written an article that covers many other stiff gravel bikes HERE.

    The Atlas ships with 45 mm tyres, but can fit wider if you remove the fenders. While the 22-inch low gear is slightly high for traditional touring, the Atlas will do just fine with a lighter load. That said, the Shimano CUES rear derailleurs can usually handle an 11-42T cassette if you’re happy to push the gearing limits a bit.

    Want to know more?
    Head over to Focus-Bikes.com to find additional specs, geometry charts, and how to place an order.

    Cube Nulane Pro FE

    best touring bikes
    • Climbing Gear: 24″ Same as average
    • Steering Speed: 68 mm 4% faster than average
    • Stack Average: 591 mm 7 mm lower than average
    • Weight: 12-13 kg or 27-29 lb Same As Average
    • Tyre Clearance: 45mm 11% Narrower than average
    • Minimum Standover: 753 mm
    • Sizes: 50, 53, 56, 59, 62
    • Price: €999

    My pick for a flat-bar light touring bike is the Cube Nulane Pro FE.

    Like the Focus Atlas, it comes fully loaded with all the touring essentials, including dynamo lights, fenders, a kickstand and a rear rack. It offers 40 mm tyre clearance and a 24-inch climbing gear, which can be reduced to 22″ with a front chainring swap.

    What makes the Cube truly amazing is its exceptional value for money. It’s just half the price of the Focus Atlas, while still offering decent quality components! It always surprises me that Cube can manage to sell a bike this good at such a great price.

    Want to know more?
    Head over to Cube.eu to find additional specs, geometry charts, and how to place an order.

    Priority 600

    • Climbing Gear: 17″ 11% lower than average
    • Steering Speed: 87 mm 24% slower than average
    • Stack Average: 623 mm 21 mm taller than average
    • Weight: 13-14 kg or 31-33 lb 4% heavier than average
    • Tyre Clearance: 2.2″ 10% Wider Than Average
    • Minimum Standover: 710 mm
    • Sizes: S, M, L, XL
    • Price: US $2499

    And lastly, the Priority 600 is the ultimate low-maintenance, light touring bike.

    Its big selling point is the fully sealed Pinion gearbox paired with a belt drive. This does make it a bit heavier and less efficient than a bike with a derailleur drivetrain, but it requires virtually no maintenance, making it perfect for long tours.

    The Priority 600 also features an upright riding position and comes fully equipped with touring essentials: dynamo lights, fenders, tubeless wheels, hydraulic disc brakes, and a convenient kickstand. It rolls on 27.5″ wheels with fast-rolling 50 mm slick tyres, ensuring a smooth and comfortable ride.

    Want to know more?
    Head over to PriorityBicycles.com to find additional specs, geometry charts, and how to place an order.

    Summary

    That rounds out the best touring bikes for 2026.

    It was super hard narrowing this list down to so few, but you can see all the other great models in my Touring Bicycle Buyer’s Guide. There are so many more great bikes that I wish I could have included here.

    My guide teaches you all about the other important bike features, as well as how to compare them all. And the best bit is that the guide is updated yearly for free!

    If you’d like to know more, there’s a ton more information about my guide on this page HERE.